CGC 063 : Musicality with Michael and Evita

//CGC 063 : Musicality with Michael and Evita

CGC 063 : Musicality with Michael and Evita

In this week’s episode Simon sits down for an interview with Michael and Evita . . . only this time Simon’s the one being interviewed! This is a great conversation about what is the true nature of musicality (and also how this applies to dance). Simon, Michael, and Evita talk about errors and how essential they are to musicality, baseline rules that are involved in more musical performances, and also the nuances that a master musician or dancer has garnered from a lifetime of knowledge. You definitely won’t want to miss this episode!

2018-03-11T19:11:41+00:00 3 Comments


  1. Donna Zitzelberger March 12, 2018 at 2:44 am - Reply

    Lots of take-aways from this podcast:

    The definition of syncopation is very succinct – “putting the emphasis on an unexpected place”.

    This quote is going in my practice binder: “You can’t just learn it, you’ve got to earn it”. I would love that on a plaque with the CGC Academy logo in the corner! Evita’s follow-up on the importance of understanding the “why” brought it home for me.

    I really enjoyed Evita’s and Michael’s dance analogies. I’ve had the pleasure of being in the audience of many Pepe Romero master classes, and he would always tell the students to imagine the fingers are dancers on the fretboard.

    A musicality tip that has helped me and my little students is creating a story for the piece. I learned this from guitarist and instructor, Scott Kritzer. The idea is the story helps with musicality, and reminds us where we are in the piece. It also really helps children to analyze the piece of music, looking for areas of conflict. The kids have created some very adventurous stories! Recently I was reminded how well it works when I had a little guy create a story for his Tarrega “Study” from Matt Hinsley’s collection for young people. The 4 lines of music came alive as he thought about peacefully walking his dog through the park and then his dog going crazy after a squirrel. :)

    Thank your for another wonderful podcast!

  2. David Kettenhofen March 13, 2018 at 6:30 pm - Reply

    I found this discussion very interesting and thought provoking. I have like most musicians or music lovers thought about this topic quite a bit. It’s kind of funny that the way I define it for myself is kind of different. I sort of agree with the Miriam definition of the quality of be musical. The reason I agree with that definition is I think the purpose of music the reason we spend hours practicing learning to play or dance hours listening to pay money for concerts etc is we are desperate to connect with others emotionally. Music has the ability to express emotions that can’t be put into words or to express more deeply than words can. So I think “the quality of being musical” is the ability to effectively express an emotion. In order to do that you have to understand a piece of music emotionaly. The piece of music has to make you feel something. You also need the technical skill to be able to effectively convey what you feel. Being able to transition between notes and phrases smoothly in a way that doesn’t take you out of the emotion of the song. Having the control to play the right articulation. Knowing what you want to emphasize and how. So I also agree with what Michael said about it being related to style. A piece of music isn’t going going to effect everyone the same way and not everyone will relate to the same emotion. So when someone says of someone else that they have musicality they are in effect saying that that person was able to make them feel something. As an example Recuerdios de la Alhambra is a very nostalgic piece perhaps sad and dealing with feelings of loss. When a performer is able to tap into those emotions and conveys them effectively it becomes musical. I also agree with what was discussed about understanding through osmosis we become more sensitive to the emotions and possible emotions of the music. Because the emotional response of both the performer and and observer is involved and because it might not exactly be the same it can be hard to define what was the musicality.

    Ps hope I am not way out in left field here

  3. Bonnie Stenstrom March 15, 2018 at 7:03 pm - Reply

    Thanks for this podcast. Interesting to hear the viewpoints of dancers and classical guitar musician on musicality. Also appreciated the reminder that you can take a simple example and add one surprise element to it and this is the beginning of the journey. Gosh, you can probably remember what you did even!
    Bonnie Stenstrom

Leave A Comment