Classical guitar education since 2010
Home » CGC 028 : Kevin Gallahger on Musical Analysis

CGC 028 : Kevin Gallahger on Musical Analysis

In this lesson

Kevin Gallagher joins Simon Powis to connect musical analysis with the experience of playing guitar. The conversation asks how recognising intervals, chords and recurring patterns can make a score more intelligible than a succession of isolated notes.

The recording contains instrumental demonstrations, and the original resources remain below. These notes provide a route into the ideas without replacing the value of hearing the examples and following them on the instrument.

Originally published in 2016. These listening notes draw on the recorded conversation. Roles, projects, releases and event announcements refer to the time of recording. Practical reflections are suggested applications, not additional quotations from the guest.

Explore the conversation

Use these approximate timestamps to jump to a topic in the recording.

Theory becomes useful when you connect it with sound

Gallagher recalls learning from guitar magazines that combined detailed transcriptions with analysis. He could read about a scale or chord, play it and hear the feature being described.

That connection made theory a way of understanding music he already cared about. It was not only a set of terms to memorise separately from playing.

Choose one chord or interval in a piece you are learning. Name it, locate its notes and listen to it in context. Repeating that connection across different pieces gradually gives the terminology something audible and practical to describe.

Learn the relationships that continue across the fingerboard

Gallagher discusses thirds, sixths and related intervals as material that appears throughout the repertoire. A pattern encountered in one position can have a relationship to another position rather than being an entirely new fact.

The discussion also considers the role of early guitar methods in presenting keys, chords and intervals together. Gallagher encourages extending that understanding beyond the first area of the fingerboard a student learns.

Begin with a short interval pattern in a comfortable position and find a second version. Compare both the notes and the physical relationship. The aim is to recognise an idea in more than one location, not to rush through a large quantity of shapes.

Recognising a pattern changes the reading task

“when you understand the basics of keys and how keys are made, scales and the derivatives thirds, then a lot of patterns are seen and understood very quickly”

— Kevin Gallagher, 18:13

Gallagher describes the difference between deciphering each note and recognising a familiar musical relationship. A scale or a sequence of thirds can be understood as an organised unit rather than a collection of unrelated symbols.

The conversation links this with memory and reading. Knowing the underlying material gives a player something additional to recognise when the surface details change.

When learning a passage, mark one repeated or sequential idea. Play its first appearance carefully, then compare the next. Ask what stays the same and what changes. This turns analysis into a concrete part of learning the notes.

A chord shape becomes more informative when you know its intervals

“the intervals are used for voice movement”

— Kevin Gallagher, 27:52

Gallagher compares familiar chord-shape thinking with an interval-based view. Identifying the notes inside a shape helps explain what happens when the bass changes or a voice moves.

His examples include inversions and intervals separated by more than an octave. These are ways of relating a physical shape to its harmonic content, rather than treating it as a diagram without a musical identity.

Take a chord you can already play and identify the bass and top note. Then follow one of those voices into the next chord. Even that small piece of analysis can make a progression easier to hear as connected lines.

Use analysis to ask a better practice question

The repertoire demonstrations bring the discussion back to actual music. The purpose of recognising intervals is to understand how a passage moves, not merely to collect labels above the staff.

A useful question might be whether a line repeats the same interval pattern, whether a bass note changes the identity of a chord or whether a passage is a familiar scale in another position.

Keep the first task small enough to complete. Analyse a few bars, play them and listen for the relationship you identified. As those relationships become familiar, they can support both more confident reading and more deliberate interpretation.

Ideas to take into your own music

These prompts are reflections on the conversation, rather than a routine prescribed by the guest.

  1. Connect a term with a sound: play an interval or chord in its musical context.
  2. Find a pattern twice: compare its appearance in two positions or passages.
  3. Look inside a chord: identify notes and intervals rather than only the shape.
  4. Follow one moving voice: hear how a progression connects from chord to chord.

Original episode notes and resources

The original introduction and resources are retained below. Any time-sensitive announcements belong to the episode’s publication period.

Kevin Gallagher is both an insightful educator and a excellent performer. To further this combination, Kevin is very giving with his knowledge and this discussion is no exception.

In this Episode we delve into musical analysis, intervals, scale patterns, voice movement and approaches to help you improve your understanding of music.

 

Kevin has provided the following downloads for you to use and follow along with the conversation. Feel free to thank Kevin for his time and efforts in the comments below! If you would like to find out more about Kevin, you can visit his site at:

Guitar 69

 

Sarabande in G Major with Analysis

Sarabande-in-G-analysis

Sor Opus 35 #2 with Analysis

Sor-op-35-#2-excerpt

 

Intervals in C Major

intervals in C Major for Simon – Full Score

Intervals in G Major

gmajorintervals for simon – Full Score

 

Continue exploring

17 thoughts on “CGC 028 : Kevin Gallahger on Musical Analysis”

    • Hi Jeff,

      Which link are you having trouble with, the download link? If you can’t access it here try opening it via your podcasts in iTunes if you that. If it’s something else let me know and we’ll try to get this sorted out for you as soon as possible.

      Peace,

      Dave B (CGC team)

      Reply
  1. Such a great and insighting article, interview and materials…..all due to a great idea as well!!
    Thanks Kevin! Thanks Simon! :-)

    Reply
  2. Fantastic . Thanks very much .
    That change of mindset is great advice…..
    Wonder why some teachers do not start teaching in this manner?
    Thanks once again!!!

    Reply
  3. Excellent podcast! One of my favourites in that it was extremely informative and insightful. Hopefully Kevin will come back
    again soon to the podcast.

    Reply
  4. An excellent pod-cast and compelling listening. The way Kevin speaks reminded me of Ben Verdery; I mean his word phrasing and enthusiasm.

    Reply
  5. Wow! A light bulb went on! Thank you for this podcast which is so pertinent to me at the moment. I’ve started learning the Segovia scales and your conversation about intervals and musical analysis started to make sense . . . a little. Ha.

    I so appreciate both of you and your willingness to share your knowledge.

    Reply
  6. Funny how life is isn’t it. I have been struggling with analysis, and had put it to one side as I had picked up a learned tome on the subject that left me more confused than ever, but with the distinct feeling that I had missed something. That something was listening to this podcast. Thank you Simon and Kevin . . . I just hope I can continue with the ideas and put them into practice.

    Reply
  7. A very interesting podcast that has helped me to view analysis as a skill and an aid to expression and learning rather than something to be avoided or as considered boring. Very worthwhile listening to again!

    Reply
  8. An excellent podcast Simon that has explained so much of what I have been missing. As an older beginner at classical guitar with next to no understanding of the theory of music I have been struggling when it comes to new work. This podcast has given me so much to think about and explore. Thank you for your efforts, they are much appreciated.

    Reply
  9. Thank you Kevin and Simon,

    a great podcast,

    people listening to the podcast of Kevin are directed into the right direction, with the latest Course about Theory Simon contributes much to open our eyes and ears to explore our musical understanding on a broader level.
    thanks
    joannes

    Reply
  10. I think I’m a terrible failure at analyzing. But listening especially towards the end I’m like “I see all that stuff. I recognize the motion and contra motion and patterns. And I call something like that “permutated scale” that “waterfall section”. I always thought you needed to be so facile at identifying keys and chord names and chord function as analyzing and I have never been able to do that well even with college theory. In fact I failed spectacularly a lot because I’m like couldn’t this be this or this or how do you know what a chord is called 100% when it doesn’t conform exactly (like some much more 20th century music) and not one teacher ever said “it doesn’t matter exactly what you call it as long as you can describe it”. And not one guitar teacher ever talked about fretboard theory at all at least in terms of analyzing, just placing fingers. I feel a little better that, yeah, I AM analyzing music to some degree or another. I do hazily understand the whole structure. Maybe this will help take away some mental blocks I have about “I’ll never understand music theory correctly”. Which I do realize stands in my way.

    Reply

Leave a Comment